Epstein's Former Model Girlfriend Says He and Trump Were "Best Friends" and "Up to No Good"

Stacey Williams, a former Sports Illustrated model and ex-girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein, reignited the controversy over Epstein’s connections by going on CNN to claim that Epstein and President Donald Trump were “best friends” and “up to no good” during the early 1990s.

She recalled that during the four or five months she dated Epstein, Trump was the only friend Epstein repeatedly mentioned, describing him as his “bro” and “wingman,” always present in stories and conversations.

Williams’ reintroduction to Epstein came at a Christmas party hosted by Trump at the Plaza Hotel in 1992, setting the stage for a string of encounters where the two men were inseparable and, she claims, frequently engaged in questionable behavior.

She says Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s notorious accomplice, would often “waft” through Epstein’s New York home, while Trump remained the primary name in Epstein’s social circle.

Williams told CNN that Epstein once checked in on Trump when the future president was supposedly “unwell and very upset,” further proof to her of their deep, complicated friendship.

Despite public denials from Trump, Williams maintains her account, insisting she witnessed firsthand the dynamics between the men and the unspoken understanding that seemed to exist between them.

She previously accused Trump of groping her in 1993, an allegation the president and his campaign have categorically denied, dismissing it as politically motivated and orchestrated by opponents.

Williams’ allegations are just the latest development in a years-long saga of speculation, legal maneuvering, and explosive revelations about Epstein’s circle and its ties to power.

She told CNN that Michael Wolff, the well-known author, holds extensive interviews with Epstein that could corroborate her story, suggesting further secrets could surface.

These anecdotes, she insists, are not isolated, and she believes the full truth about the relationship between Epstein and Trump has yet to be revealed.

Her comments have triggered fresh debate about the lingering shadows of Epstein’s legacy, the reliability of those connected to him, and the lengths the powerful will go to keep certain secrets buried.

Williams recounted an incident at Trump Tower in 1993 that, she says, exposed the disturbing relationship between Trump and Epstein and left her traumatized.

She claims she was taken by Epstein to Trump’s office, where Trump allegedly groped her in full view of Epstein, all while both men continued a “normal” conversation about her career and magazine covers.

Despite assistants walking past and the event unfolding in broad daylight, Williams said she was frozen by the brazenness, a reaction she now understands as shock, leaving her unable to resist or process what was happening.

Afterward, she remembers Epstein becoming enraged and blaming her for the encounter, screaming at her on Fifth Avenue and accusing her of letting Trump do it.

Williams describes the episode as “coordinated” between the two men, a twisted game where she felt like a pawn in their dynamic, a feeling intensified by Epstein’s previous knowledge of her strong reactions to harassment.

She insists this was not an isolated event, but rather part of a pattern in the men’s relationship, with each playing a role in a web of manipulation and dominance.

Trump’s campaign has repeatedly denied all allegations, dismissing Williams as an “activist” with a political agenda, but Williams maintains she passed a polygraph and has kept a postcard from Trump as further proof.

She claims Epstein and Trump were “very close and up to no good,” and that their friendship was built on shared secrets and a mutual enjoyment of power and privilege.

The White House has refused to comment further, while media outlets and social media have circulated her claims, fueling renewed scrutiny.

Williams says she is willing to provide more evidence and hopes the truth will eventually be fully exposed, no matter how uncomfortable for those involved.

Her testimony has been met with skepticism by some, support by others, and remains a focal point in the debate over the influence and impunity of America’s elite.

The controversy escalated with the Wall Street Journal’s publication of a report claiming to have seen a sexually suggestive birthday card from Trump to Epstein in 2003, featuring a crude doodle and a message about “wonderful secrets.”

Trump immediately called the card a fabrication, stating that it was “not my language, not my words” and that he had never drawn pictures like that, insisting the story was false and malicious.

The story prompted Trump to file a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones, Rupert Murdoch, and associated reporters, alleging reckless disregard for the truth and intentional harm to his reputation.

The Journal, for its part, has stood by its reporting, saying it reviewed the birthday album Ghislaine Maxwell assembled for Epstein, though it did not publish a full image of the card or details about how it was obtained.

Williams, when asked whether the card was out of character, responded incredulously, saying it was entirely consistent with what she witnessed between Trump and Epstein and that the “receipts” of their behavior were well known to some.

She referenced Michael Wolff again as a potential source of corroborating evidence, pointing to his hours of interviews with Epstein about the duo’s activities.

Trump’s denials have only intensified the public’s interest, with his supporters and critics fiercely debating the credibility of the WSJ’s reporting and the motivations of those involved.

The episode has reignited scrutiny on Epstein’s infamous “black book” and address logs, which included Trump’s and Melania’s phone numbers as well as numerous high-profile figures.

Trump’s lawsuit is notable as one of the largest defamation claims ever filed by a sitting president, further escalating his ongoing battle with the media and critics.

This scandal continues to play out in federal court and in the court of public opinion, casting a long shadow over Trump’s efforts to distance himself from Epstein’s legacy.

For Williams, the existence of the card and Trump’s reaction are just more pieces in a puzzle she claims the public deserves to see fully assembled.

As the news broke, Trump’s handling of the Epstein files and his relationships came under withering scrutiny, igniting fierce divisions within his own political base.

His supporters, long primed to believe in “deep state” conspiracies about Epstein’s death and secrets, became agitated when the Justice Department announced there was no evidence of murder or a secret “client list.”

Many MAGA loyalists began openly criticizing Trump, with prominent conservative voices blaming Attorney General Pam Bondi for mishandling the investigation and accusing the administration of failing to deliver on transparency.

Trump, facing backlash, lashed out on Truth Social, defending Bondi and condemning his critics as “selfish people” who were attacking a “perfect administration” over a story that “never dies.”

He described the release of only partially redacted files as a necessary step to protect victims, while reiterating that no incriminating list or proof of blackmail had been found.

Meanwhile, Ghislaine Maxwell, the only person convicted in the Epstein scandal, signaled willingness to testify before Congress, claiming she was never offered a plea deal and could provide critical information missing from the official record.

Maxwell’s legal team has appealed her conviction, arguing she was protected by a non-prosecution agreement originally struck with Epstein, and that her story has not yet been fully told.

These developments have deepened existing rifts within the pro-Trump media ecosystem, with some pundits demanding full transparency and others defending the administration’s approach.

As the public debate raged, media outlets continued to publish new details and interviews, keeping the Epstein story at the center of America’s political discourse.

Through it all, Williams’s allegations and Trump’s counterattacks have remained a lightning rod for controversy, with the truth still obscured by a fog of accusation, denial, and speculation.

Ghislaine Maxwell’s offer to testify before Congress injected new uncertainty into the scandal, raising the possibility that the full story of Epstein’s circle could yet come to light.

Maxwell’s willingness comes as she appeals her 20-year prison sentence, claiming the government violated a prior deal and that her prosecution was politically motivated.

A source close to Maxwell told reporters she had never been asked to share what she knows, and that she would “welcome the chance to tell the American public the truth,” potentially revealing more about Trump, Epstein, and others.

Federal authorities, however, maintain that their exhaustive review found no evidence of blackmail material or a client list implicating other prominent individuals.

Critics have argued that Maxwell’s testimony could be a game-changer if Congress pursues it, but skepticism remains high given her own role and credibility issues.

The legal and political stakes are enormous: if Maxwell does speak, her account could either corroborate or undermine the existing narrative, affecting reputations and legal strategies for years.

Trump’s administration has been required to respond to her Supreme Court appeal, adding further complications to the case’s already complex web of litigation.

Allies and critics alike are watching closely, wondering if Maxwell’s cooperation could finally produce the elusive answers about Epstein’s vast network and the extent of its reach into the elite.

Meanwhile, victims’ advocates continue to demand full disclosure and accountability, insisting that justice will only be served when all facts are made public.

As Maxwell’s legal battle unfolds, her next moves could define the future of the Epstein saga and the fates of those still ensnared by it.

Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal stands as a remarkable escalation in his ongoing war with the media and those reporting on his links to Epstein.

Filed in Miami federal court, the suit names Murdoch, Dow Jones, News Corp, and several WSJ journalists as defendants, alleging actual malice and intentional harm to Trump’s character and business interests.

Legal experts have noted that such a massive claim is unprecedented, far exceeding even the largest judgments against figures like Alex Jones or Fox News’s Dominion settlement.

For Trump to succeed, he must prove the reporters knowingly published false information or acted with reckless disregard, a high bar for defamation cases involving public figures.

Dow Jones and the Journal have responded by defending their journalism, expressing full confidence in their reporting and pledging to fight the suit vigorously.

Observers see the case as a high-stakes test of press freedom and accountability, with implications for how media organizations cover powerful figures accused of wrongdoing.

Meanwhile, the legal fight has provided fresh ammunition for Trump’s political opponents and supporters alike, deepening polarization in the American public.

The ongoing litigation may take years to resolve, but its impact is already being felt across the political and media landscape.

As new evidence and testimony emerge, the outcome will help shape the legacy of both Trump and the institutions he targets.

In the background, the search for truth continues, clouded by legal battles and the constant churn of the news cycle.

The pursuit of the “Epstein files”—rumored lists, flight logs, and coded black books—has become a central obsession in the investigation, with many believing the truth remains hidden.

Despite promises of transparency, official releases have revealed little new information, disappointing those hoping for revelations about who participated in Epstein’s criminal activities.

Federal memos released by the Department of Justice have stated there is no evidence of a “client list” or successful blackmail of prominent individuals, further fueling suspicion among the public and survivors.

Williams and other witnesses maintain that crucial evidence exists but remains concealed, whether out of fear, politics, or deals struck in the shadows.

Media investigations continue to uncover links between Epstein, Trump, Maxwell, and other influential figures, though most names in court records are not accused of crimes.

Conspiracy theories proliferate, driven by secrecy and the failures of institutions to deliver satisfying answers about Epstein’s network and its possible cover-ups.

For survivors and advocates, the lack of accountability and full disclosure is a persistent source of pain, underscoring the enduring power imbalance between the elite and their victims.

Meanwhile, the lawsuits, appeals, and congressional inquiries grind on, with each new twist adding to the labyrinthine complexity of the case.

The specter of lost or destroyed evidence—photos, letters, logs—haunts the narrative, with each side accusing the other of deception or deliberate obfuscation.

The world waits for the next revelation, uncertain whether the full story will ever come to light.

The Wall Street Journal’s decision to publish the birthday card story, despite Trump’s personal pleas to kill it, has drawn attention to the tensions between media power and political influence.

Rupert Murdoch, owner of WSJ and Fox News, is described as playing a careful, strategic game—balancing between the demands of Trump’s base and the need for journalistic credibility.

Media analysts argue that Murdoch’s approach allows his empire to appeal both to Trump skeptics and die-hard supporters, protecting his business interests while navigating political turbulence.

The WSJ’s critical coverage of Trump stands in contrast to Fox News’s more supportive stance, reflecting a broader split within right-leaning media over how to handle the scandal.

The episode has also underscored the importance of investigative journalism in holding the powerful to account, even in the face of lawsuits and public denials.

Yet the story’s relegation to lower-profile placements on certain platforms shows the ongoing balancing act between reporting, business, and politics.

Murdoch’s critics argue that he ultimately prioritizes profit and influence over principles, but the publication of the Epstein letter story suggests a willingness to challenge even former allies.

The result is a fractured media landscape, with trust in institutions and narratives increasingly divided along partisan lines.

For Trump, the episode is both a legal battle and a war for public opinion, one that he and his supporters are determined to fight on every front.

As the headlines swirl, the underlying truths—and the fate of those who know them—remain elusive.

As the scandal grows, the relationships among Trump, Epstein, Maxwell, and their associates are being re-examined in minute detail, with new revelations emerging from interviews, court records, and investigative reporting.

Williams’s testimony, along with fresh scrutiny of flight logs, address books, and other documents, keeps the pressure on Trump and those in Epstein’s circle.

The apparent “falling out” between Trump and Epstein in the early 2000s is seen by some as strategic distancing, though records and social events show the two were in close contact for years.

Maxwell’s appeals and offers to testify add more uncertainty, as do calls from within Congress and the public for deeper investigation and more transparency.

Meanwhile, survivors and advocates are working to keep the focus on the victims, demanding justice and a full reckoning for all who enabled or participated in Epstein’s crimes.

The possibility of further indictments, lawsuits, or congressional hearings looms, promising more drama in the months and years ahead.

Through it all, the question remains: how much will the public ever truly know, and who will be held accountable?

For those at the center of the web, the stakes could not be higher—personally, politically, and legally.

As new threads are pulled, the tapestry of secrets, lies, and power struggles continues to unravel.

The intertwined stories of Trump, Epstein, and Maxwell have left a profound impact on American political and cultural life, raising questions about privilege, accountability, and the corrupting influence of unchecked power.

For survivors like Williams, the fight for recognition and justice is ongoing, complicated by denials, lawsuits, and institutional failures.

For Trump, the stakes are existential—his reputation, legal standing, and future ambitions all riding on the outcome of investigations and court battles.

For the media, the scandal has tested the limits of press freedom and responsibility, forcing tough choices about what to publish and how to withstand pressure from the powerful.

The American public remains transfixed, alternately outraged, skeptical, or numb as the revelations accumulate and the legal wheels grind slowly forward.

As new evidence, testimony, and lawsuits emerge, the true legacy of the Epstein scandal will be shaped by those willing to speak out and the willingness of institutions to confront their own complicity.

In the end, the story is about more than just individual guilt or innocence; it is about the hidden machinery of influence that shapes lives at the highest levels.

Whether justice will finally prevail—or secrets will continue to rule—remains the defining question of this ongoing American drama.

The world watches and waits, aware that even the most powerful can be brought low by the truth, if it ever comes fully to light.